Intellectual properties are crucial for technology developers and manufacturers. As a result, the disputes for patented technologies continue to go on. This week, Japan’s Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation (MCC) announced its victory of patent infringement litigation and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has begun investigation for the patent infringement case raised by UC Santa Barbara.
MCC reported that on July 31 it obtained a judgement recognizing the infringement of its patent for red phosphor in China by the defendants, U.S.-based Intematix Corporation, its affiliate in China, Intematix Suzhou Lighting and its sales agency, GrandLux Optoelectronics.
MCC filed a suit in the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court in 2015, alleging that products of Intematix and two companies infringed the patent (No. ZL201110066517.7*) for red phosphor which is owned by MCC and the National Institute for Materials Science. MCC sought an injunction on the production and sale of phosphors in China and damages in this litigation. The court recognized MCC’s claim and adjudicated an injunction to the aforementioned Intematix and two companies’ infringement action and to order Intematix and two companies to pay a total of RMB 2 million yuan (US$ 279,670) as compensation.
Meanwhile, the law firm, Nixon Peabody, posted that ITC has instituted an investigation based on a complaint filed by the Regents of the University of California (UC), alleging unauthorized importation and sales of filament LED light bulbs that infringe UC patents by five major retailers: Amazon.com, Bed Bath & Beyond, Ikea, Target, and Walmart.
The investigation is part of a first-of-its-kind patent enforcement campaign launched by UC to promote respect for its patent rights in revolutionary lighting technology developed by a Nobel laureate–led research group at UC Santa Barbara. Among the campaign’s unique attributes is the seeking of relief by a university system from the ITC—an approach rarely considered by academic patent owners. Lawsuits seeking the payment of reasonable royalties were filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles against the same retailers.
Related readings:
Proprietary Rights
You may not reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, display, perform, publish, distribute, disseminate, broadcast or circulate to any third party, any materials contained on the services without the express prior written consent of the website or its legal owner.
Over the past 50 years, Nichia has demonstrated its commitment to improving the overall performance…
To fund the acquisition and ongoing operation of the production facility, BluGlass has secured A$3.4…
New CAS 140D IR spectroradiometer with improved optical and electronic components offer the user higher…
SSC boasts world's only LED and LD technology for vehicles using all wavelengths of light…
E-cars do not have a classic radiator grille, so the front of the vehicle…
“We welcome the further alignment of ANSI C137.4-2021 and D4i, which is expected to lead…